Use of GPP to deploy printers in a network.

-

are there "known issues" in distributing printers gpp concerning number of them ? let's have parc of 600 network printers, distributed on 15 sites interconnected 10 mb wan links. per experience, you'd create 1 gpp, 2 gpp, 10 gpp or 50 gpp ? login time should kept in acceptable range. the use of per site gpo is, in opinion, best approach. 

in fact, want know if microsoft thought of "optimal" number of printers push in "bulk deployment" gpp in medium-sized network, , if so, number or range ?

i have configured environment had on 250 gpp printer mappings... , worked acceptable performance... if mapping 250 printers take long time users mapped approx 5 performance 1min to process entire list , quicker process list second time there no printers actions perform. so yes takes time map lot of printers , after first run delay hardly noticable... not recommend more 250 / 300 printers in 1 gpo manageability point of view.

hope helps

alan burchill (mvp)
http://www.grouppolicy.biz


Windows Server  >  Group Policy



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CRL Revocation always failed

-
hi all, i try configure radius server nps, somehow certificate authentication client failed with reason: reason = revocation function unable check revocation because revocation server offline. then check certificate client, certutil -f -urlfetch -verify client7.cer, result follow: issuer:     cn=entca     dc=intra     dc=domain     dc=co     dc=sg subject:     cn=computer.intra.domain.co.sg cert serial number: 1c5b00de000000000041 dwflags = ca_verify_flags_allow_untrusted_root (0x1) dwflags = ca_verify_flags_ignore_offline (0x2) dwflags = ca_verify_flags_full_chain_revocation (0x8) dwflags = ca_verify_flags_console_trace (0x20000000) dwflags = ca_verify_flags_dump_chain (0x40000000) chainflags = cert_chain_revocation_check_chain (0x20000000) hcce_local_machine cert_chain_policy_base -------- cert_chain_context -------- chaincontext.dwinfostatus = cert_trust_has_preferred_issuer (0x100) chaincontext.dwerrorstatus = cert_trust_revocation_sta
Read more

Failed to query the results of bpa xpath

-
Image
i have new server installed hyper v, iis , domain services roles on it.  i checking event log , see warning multiple times, idea how rid of it?? failed query results of bpa xpath: microsoft/windows/fileservices:$reports$\*\result.xml:/resultdatabase/result. error: device attached system not functioning., last error: system cannot find path specified.. follow me on twitter <<< levalencia blog <<< hi, similar issue discussed in forum: to rid of warnings: 1. go dashboard 2. click on add roles , features 3. click next "before begin step" 4. select "role based or feature based installation" , click next 5. select given server server pool , click next 6. in server roles step make sure following checked:   file , storage services > file , iscsi services > file server, click next 7.click next through rest of steps , install server role 8. rerun bpa scan described earlier for more information please refer following ms
Read more

0x300000d errors in Microsoft Remote Desktop client

-
we use rd connect home users office. @ server side remote desktop gateway configured on 2008r2 server. experience following:   for years worked fine, starting last year users apple macbook experienced connection errors after new version of microsoft remote desktop in app store , automatic update. after couple of weeks error disappaered when new updates released. since 6 8 weeks problem again. because don’t have macbook cannot reproduce problem.   starting couple of weeks samsung s6 experiencing problems, here version 8.1.37.135 installed, error displayed is: can’t connect tot remote pc because remote desktop gateway server temporaraily unavailable. try connecting later or contact network administrator assistance. error code  0x300000d   because has worked fine years expect issues on client can configuration error on gateway server.   who pin point real cause?   however, testing other rd gateway server works ok settings identically. hi ruud, as works rd
Read more